%20--%3e%3cdefs%3e%3cstyle%3e%20.st0%20{%20fill:%20%23061b40;%20}%20.st1%20{%20fill:%20%23306af1;%20}%20.st2%20{%20fill:%20%235ce5cf;%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cg%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M55,10.5h9v3h-9v9h12V7.5h-12v3ZM64,19.5h-6v-3h6v3Z'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='69%2016.5%2078%2016.5%2078%2019.5%2069%2019.5%2069%2022.5%2081%2022.5%2081%2013.5%2072%2013.5%2072%2010.5%2081%2010.5%2081%207.5%2069%207.5%2069%2016.5'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='95%2010.5%2095%207.5%2083%207.5%2083%2022.5%2095%2022.5%2095%2019.5%2086%2019.5%2086%2016.5%2095%2016.5%2095%2013.5%2086%2013.5%2086%2010.5%2095%2010.5'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M40,1.5v21h11.6l1.4-1.4v-7.6h0c0,0-1.4-1.5-1.4-1.5l1.4-1.4V2.9l-1.4-1.4h-11.6ZM50,19.5h-7v-6h7v6ZM50,10.5h-7v-6h7v6Z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cpath%20class='st1'%20d='M23.1,24L14.7,4.8l-4.9,11.2h3.8l-1.8,4H3.3L12.1,0H2C.9,0,0,.9,0,2v20c0,1.1.9,2,2,2h21.1Z'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st2'%20d='M34,0h-16.8l10.6,24h6.2c1.1,0,2-.9,2-2V2C36,.9,35.1,0,34,0ZM32.5,20h-4V4h4v16Z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
In recent legal proceedings, Getty Images suffered a major setback in its lawsuit against the generative AI company Stability AI in the UK. After several months of hearings, Judge Joanna Smith made her ruling.
Although Getty made some progress in trademark infringement, the judge confirmed that Stability AI's image generation model, Stable Diffusion, used Getty's trademarks. However, Getty's claims regarding copyright infringement were not supported. The judge pointed out that Stability AI did not store or copy copyrighted works, and therefore did not constitute infringement.
Image source note: Image generated by AI
After the ruling, Getty Images released a statement on its official website, stating that the court confirmed that content generated by the Stable Diffusion model included its trademarks, which it considered an important victory for intellectual property owners. Nevertheless, Getty Images also expressed concerns about the challenges of protecting creative works, calling on governments to establish stronger transparency rules to prevent costly legal disputes and protect creators' rights. Getty also said it would use the outcome of this UK ruling in related lawsuits in the United States.
The legal counsel for Stability AI also expressed satisfaction with the ruling, calling it an acknowledgment of its legality. Analyst David Nicholson noted that although the ruling was a victory for Stability AI, the win for Getty Images in the trademark aspect should not be overlooked. He stated that both sides saw hope for victory in their respective areas.
This lawsuit revealed the complexity of legal battles in the AI field, especially concerning the definitions of copyright and trademarks. As AI models continue to evolve, the issue of intellectual property ownership of generated content has become more complex. In the future, finding a balance between protecting creators' rights and promoting technological development will be a significant challenge for the legal community.
Key Points:
🌟 Getty Images' copyright infringement lawsuit against Stability AI in the UK was not supported, but it achieved partial success in trademark issues.
⚖️ The court ruled that Stability AI does not store or copy copyrighted works, and therefore does not constitute infringement.
📝 This case highlights the complexity of AI-related legal disputes, and the issue of intellectual property ownership urgently needs to be resolved.