Translated Data: Recent studies have shown that in the top AI conferences of 2023-2024, content generated by models like ChatGPT accounted for as much as 17% in peer reviews. Much of this review content appeared near the deadline and lacked academic citations and reviewer involvement. This raises questions such as whether to disclose AI assistance in reviewing. The growth of artificial intelligence has implications for the quality control of science, necessitating a reconsideration of the credit for mixed knowledge work.