The legal battle between the two titans of the artificial intelligence field, Elon Musk and Sam Altman, has seen new developments. On February 24, 2026, a federal judge in California officially dismissed xAI's lawsuit against OpenAI for allegedly stealing its trade secrets.

Although Musk has faced a setback, this "century lawsuit" involving a sum of $134.5 billion (approximately RMB 930.2 billion) is far from over.

Key Ruling: Insufficient Evidence, OpenAI Wins Temporarily

Judge Rita Lin of the San Francisco Federal District Court stated in her ruling that xAI's current complaint did not prove that OpenAI had engaged in direct misconduct:

  • Lack of Relevance: The judge noted that while xAI accused former employees of taking the source code of Grok when they left, there was no evidence that OpenAI had encouraged employees to steal secrets or used these secrets after their employment.

  • Right to Pursue Further: The judge granted xAI a grace period until March 17, allowing it to submit a revised complaint and additional evidence before that date.

Multiple Fronts: Musk's Legal Strategy

In addition to the lawsuit against OpenAI, Musk has also opened other fronts:

  • Individual Accountability: xAI has separately sued former engineer Xuechen Li, accusing him of being a "insider" who took core secrets to the ChatGPT team.

  • Profit-Related Dispute: Musk is pursuing a larger lawsuit against OpenAI's transition into a for-profit entity, accusing it of abandoning its original non-profit mission.

Responses from All Sides: A Confrontational Public Debate

  • OpenAI's Strong Counterattack: In a statement, OpenAI said the ruling proved Musk's lawsuit was a "baseless harassment," and directly claimed that the real motive behind the lawsuit was that Grok could not compete with ChatGPT.

  • xAI Preparing for Action: Although the case was dismissed, the xAI team is urgently preparing new evidence, hoping to turn the situation around before the jury selection begins on April 27.

Industry Insight:

As the AGI era approaches, the movement of top technical talent and the ownership of core code have become a "powder keg" for major manufacturers. IT Home believes that the outcome of this case will not only determine OpenAI's business valuation but also set new legal boundaries for intellectual property protection in the global AI industry.